Diary 2024-07-13

It's a vacation. 〜〜〜〜 feeling

https://gyazo.com/16e00f1412b8d2ae769d169a97532827

*We are accepting applications for participation from Miraikan ID holders. Applications will be accepted from Friday, July 12, 2024 at 17:00 to Friday, July 19, 2024, by lottery.

*Because of popular demand, other openings have already been filled and closed.

I see that the seats via Peatix are already full and only the lottery via Miraikan ID is available.

It is not good to write something critical of an organization because it tends to be interpreted as criticism of the organization to which you belong.

A situation where one person in a volunteer circle who is not paid in any way is criticizing a certain kind of behavior that is not actually considered a problem by the organization that is the main payer of the salary.

https://gyazo.com/f0dc35a2dcc9f2e4f2069b6c7e6396ab

The president liked me on the web.

I missed it, I wonder if it's on TVer or something.

>FzkWkkk0wwXFcuKG: TBS Info 7days

I found the opening timpani dive by Mr. Shinozaki of Kanagawa Philharmonic Orchestra too funny, and then Mr. Takahiro Yasuno appeared on stage.

Mr. Takuji Izawa angrily said, "I wanted to talk about Mr. Takahiro Yasuno, who was bound not to mention other than the four main candidates during the election period.

This is something the people of Tokyo will be upset about.

7days doesn't seem to be available on TVer or anything.

For what it's worth, there was an article.

Recently, politicians are expected to be perfect, or rather, perfect because they have to choose the best person, but there is no such thing as perfect, so they should just update each other. But there is no such thing as perfect, so we should update each other.

I wanted to talk about this during the campaign... I wanted to say it so badly, but I was told by all the stations, 'Please don't talk about individual candidates. Does this make sense? I'd like to think about it.

Long supplement from the person in question

I myself have been told by the media that "this is the way it should be" in terms of the direction of my statements during the campaign, but it was a bit softer, not the best use of the words regulation or repression. No exaggeration. I was also explained why, and I understood it as my job. Personal opinions are another thing, but it's very important to draw the line there. I've never actually felt the pressure to be funny, at least not to me.

And what I was told was that it is not good to talk too much about by-names because it is biased, not that we should not talk about anything other than the four main candidates. I find the word "certain" to be polysyllabic and inconvenient. I meant to say "pick any one person," but it could also mean "a fixed portion.

I understand and am aware of that, but in my personal opinion, shouldn't we be taking up more things? I don't want to say who I voted for because of the secret election. I don't want to say who I voted for because of the secret election, but I think it would be easier to talk about this or that on a by-name basis. That's what I was talking about.

Since this is a live broadcast, please excuse the language. The letter of a statement does not necessarily equal the intended idea, the way you speak, and the contents of your head. I will try to bring it closer, though. I have my ideas, you have yours, and I am not speaking for anyone else.

I am sorry for the compliments, but I thought there were some discrepancies, partly due to my lack of ability. I will continue to work hard and try to express myself more politely.

---